Lisa Zaar vs Yara Bartashevich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Bartashevich has a slightly better second serve performance in recent form, winning 40.97% of points compared to Zaar's 37.01%. Does this indicate a potential advantage for Bartashevich in serve games? Potentially.
• Return game stats show Bartashevich excels in winning second serve returns at 54.27%, while Zaar slightly leads with 54.72%. For first serve returns, Zaar is stronger with 39.18% compared to Bartashevich's 33.25%.
• Both players save breakpoints at a similar rate, with Bartashevich at 48.15% and Zaar at 46.51%. Could this affect key moments in the match? It's possible.
• Over the past year, Zaar has a higher overall match win rate at 58.82% versus Bartashevich's 42%, indicating better recent form.
• Bartashevich performs best on Hard courts (54% win rate), while Zaar is strongest on Indoor Hard (59%).
• When it comes to the level of event, Zaar has been more successful in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.93% of matches, compared to Bartashevich's 40.48%.
• Bartashevich has faced opponents with an average rank of 371.24, slightly higher than Zaar's average of 401.09, suggesting Bartashevich has faced slightly tougher competition.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Zaar has the edge with a 56% winning rate in such situations, compared to Bartashevich's 52%.
• In converting break points, Zaar has a slight advantage, converting 43.62% of opportunities compared to Bartashevich's 42.13%.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

Both players display resilience in their respective performances, with Bartashevich displaying a marginally stronger second serve, which could be beneficial in serve-dominated matches.

Zaar, however, shows a more well-rounded game with better performance in return games, especially first serve returns, which may prove critical during tightly contested points.

The match history over the past year favors Zaar, with a significantly higher win percentage. Coupled with superior breakpoint conversion rates and performance under pressure, Zaar tends to be the stronger player in deciding moments.

Taking into account Zaar's higher success rate in tougher matches on the same event levels as Bartashevich and their slight edge in potential decisive sets, Zaar appears to hold the advantage overall.

Given these analyses, Zaar is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.